Em resposta a isto, isto. «What has happened, I suggest, is that you have lost the argument over the meaning and the proper hermeneutics of Vatican II. That explains why you relentlessly pursue your fifty-year quest for a liberal Protestant Catholicism, at precisely the moment when the liberal Protestant project is collapsing from its inherent theological incoherence. And that is why you have now engaged in a vicious smear of another former Vatican II colleague, Joseph Ratzinger (...) That grotesque falsification of the truth perhaps demonstrates where odium theologicum can lead a man. But it is nonetheless shameful.»
1 comentário:
E quando ele conclui que: “the foundation of all faith is the Bible, because it has survived for so long. The historical Jesus is not important "as he really was" but rather as a "tool" to help verify the faith as handed down over the centuries.” ?
Jesus é uma “ferramenta”? Considero esta afirmação muito radical!
Enviar um comentário